The history of rabies control in Ukraine from the time of Pasteur to the present day

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22141/2312-413X.9.1.2021.228821

Keywords:

rabies, rabies vaccine, history of rabies science, rabies epizootic, ways of rabies eradication, reasons of vaccine failure, rabies in Ukraine

Abstract

Rabies remains the oldest viral zoonotic disease, which always ends in death and which is now widespread throughout the world and causes an annual death of about 60 thousand people. Since rabies eradication in Ukraine continues over 135 years, our goal was to remind about the problems and successes of providing control rabies in different periods of the epizootic process in the last century, to remind the main specific features of infection and show real problems today. Materials for the analysis were archival data of reports of regional sanitary-epidemiological agencies, LV Gromashevsky Institute of Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases, Laboratory of Neuroinfections of IVM NAAS of Ukraine, as well as the reports of regional departments of veterinary medicine of the State Food and Consumer Service of Ukraine. It has been shown that epizootic peaks were observed in certain historical periods. During the first period of urban rabies (dogs), mass vaccinations of dogs in combination with strict regulation of the number of homeless animals proved to be effective. The second period of fox rabies lasted 30 years, of which almost 20 years were relatively successful, which was facilitated by the strictest implementation of measures to regulate the density of foxes in all regions of Ukraine. At the beginning of the XXI century, the intensity of the epizootic process sharpened. At the same time, in all areas, the density of foxes was no longer maintained at an accep­table level and the incidence of foxes increased almost 20 times. Oral vaccination started in 2001, is still not fully implemented. Vaccination of domestic carnivores also does not reach the required level of coverage of 70 % of the population. Homeless animals are also vaccinated, although it has long been proven that under constant stress and hypothermia, the vaccine does not cause the production of antibody titers to a protective level. Thus, currently, the main problem in order to preserve a human from rabies is dogs. Thus, in 2019, 51,232 people were attacked by dogs. In total, in 2019, 73,962 people applied for rabies assistance, and 21,980 people were vaccinated. There were 4039 people with severe bites, of which 1161 were bitten by sick animals with a confirmed diagnosis and 777 people were attacked by wild animals (1938 people were saved from death), and 16,113 people were injured by light bites (73.3 % of the total vaccinated) were given 10 days to determine the danger of the bite, but failed to do so as the animal escaped. Due to this category of victims, the number of vaccinated increases sharply. It is important to note that each bite by a stray dog for the people is a punishment, and a course of rabies vaccinations costs about 6 thousand UAH depending on the degree of the bite, so the question of regulation of the number of stray dogs and the feasibility of their vaccination remains open.

References

WHO Expert Consultation on rabies. World Health Organization. Technical report series. 2018. Vol. 931. Р. 1-88.

Rupprecht C.E., Freuling C.M., Mani R.S. et al. A history of rabies — The foundation for global canine rabies elimination. Rabies. Elsevier Inc., 2020. Р. 1-42.

WHO. Prevention and control of rabies in wild animals. WHO Expert Consultation on Rabies. Second report. 2013. Р. 77-92.

King A.A., Fooks A.R., Aubert M. et al. Historical Perspective of Rabies in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin. OIE (World orga­nisation for animal health), Paris, France. 2004. 361 р.

Mogilevsky B.Y. Practical Rabbiology. 1997. 144 р.

Botvinkin A., Kosenko M. Rabies in the European parts of Russia, Belarus and Ukraine. In: King A.A., Fooks A.R., Aubert M., Wandeler A.I. (eds.). Historical perspective of rabies in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin. Paris, OIE World Organization for Animal Health, 2004.

Selimov M.A. Rabies. 1978. 336 р.

Rabies Bulletin Europe. 2019. Rabies Information System of the WHO Collaboration Centre for Rabies Surveillance and Research. URL: https://www.who-rabies-bulletin.org/site-page/queries.

Wallace R.M., Blanton J. Epidemiology. USA, Atlanta, 2020. Р. 105-142.

Robardet E., Bosnjak D., Englund L. et al. Zero Endemic Cases of Wildlife Rabies (Classical Rabies Virus, RABV) in the European Union by 2020. An Achievable Goal. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2019. Vol. 4. № 4. Р. 124.

Anderson A., Kotzé J., Shwiff S.A. et al. A bioeconomic model for the optimization of local canine rabies control. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2019. Vol. 13. № 5. Р. 1-24.

Fisher C., Streicker D., Schnell M. The spread and evolution of rabies virus: conquering new frontiers. Nature Reviews Microbio­logy. 2018. Vol. 16. № 4. Р. 241-255.

Taylor L., Nel L., Hampson K. et al. Difficulties in estima­ting the human burden of canine rabies. Acta Tropica. 2017. Vol. 165.

Mahadevan A., Suja M.S., Mani R.S. et al. Perspectives in Diagnosis and Treatment of Rabies Viral Encephalitis: Insights from Pathogenesis. Neurotherapeutics. 2016. Vol. 13. № 3. Р. 477-492.

Picot V., Rasuli A., Abella-Rider A. et al. The Middle East and Eastern Europe rabies Expert Bureau (MEEREB) third mee­ting: Lyon-France (7–8 April, 2015). Journal of Infection and Public Health. 2017. Vol. 10. № 6. Р. 695-701.

Cliquet F., Picard-Meyer E., Robardet E. Rabies in Europe: what are the risks? Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy. 2014. Vol. 12. № 8. Р. 905-908.

Cliquet F., Freuling C., Smreczak M. et al. Development of harmonised schemes for monitoring and reporting of rabies in animals in the European Union. EFSA Supporting Publications. 2010. Vol. 7. № 7. Р. 60.

Chirkova A.F. Materials on dynamic of fox abundance in Voronezh Province in connection with prognoses of its harvests. In Questions of Fur Animals Biology. Ministry of Agriculture Publisher, Moscow. 1953. Vol. 8. Р. 20-31.

Grishok L. Epizootiology of rabies in Ukrainian SSR. Veterinary. 1977. Vol. 5. Р. 53-56.

Scherbak Yu., Ryaboshapka A. Ecological and epidemiological problems of wildlife rabies. Journal of Epidemiology and Immunobiology. 1978. Vol. 12. Р. 14-21.

Cherkasskiy B. Epidemiology and prevention of rabies Medicine. 1985. 287 р.

Kantorovich R.A. The natural foci of ‘Dikovanie’ and rabies in the USSR — epidemiological, ecological and virological research. University of Moscow, Moscow, Russia.

Makovska I., Nedosekov V., Kornienko L. et al. Retrospective study of rabies epidemiology in Ukraine (1950–2019). Theoretical and Applied Veterinary Medicine. 2020. Vol. 8. № 1. Р. 36-49.

Kornienko L.E., Moroz O.A., Mezhensky A.O. et al. Epizooto­logical and epidemiological aspects for rabies in Ukraine for the period from 1999 to 2018. Veterinary science, technologies of animal husbandry and nature management. 2019. № 3. Р. 90-109.

Nedosekov V., Nikitova A., Polupan I. Impact of unfavorable housing conditions of animals to formation. The Animal Biology. 2013. Vol. 15. № 4. Р. 80-84.

Makovska I.F., Nedosekov V.V., Polupan I.M. et al. Distribution trend rabies in cats in Ukraine. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. 2018. Vol. 20. № 92. Р. 18-23.

Makovska І. Modelling the spread of rabies in Ukraine. Ukrainian Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 2020. Vol. 11. № 3. Р. 33-45. https://doi.org/10.31548/ujvs2020.03.004

Makovska I., Zhukovskyi M., Nedosekov V. Economic aspects of animal rabies prevention. Scientific reports of NULES. 2020. Vol. 88. № 6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2020.06.016

Published

2021-04-22

Issue

Section

Lecture